Filling your Portafilter
Filling your Portafilter
Hi,
I'm curious in knowing people's approach to filling their portafilters for an espresso. I've noticed two major approaches to this: one is to just dose until the portafilter is filled with a heaping mound of coffee, level it out, tamp, etc. Using the technique it would seem that the amount of coffee (i.e. grams) in the PF depends on the grind but the volume is fairly constant. Alternatively, others weigh the amount of coffee (e.g. say 17.0g), level it out, tamp, etc. Using this approach, the volume changes depending on the grind but the amount of coffee is constant. I'd like to know which approach you use and why. Perhaps you have a different approach altogether! I'd like to hear about that too... thanks!!
I'm curious in knowing people's approach to filling their portafilters for an espresso. I've noticed two major approaches to this: one is to just dose until the portafilter is filled with a heaping mound of coffee, level it out, tamp, etc. Using the technique it would seem that the amount of coffee (i.e. grams) in the PF depends on the grind but the volume is fairly constant. Alternatively, others weigh the amount of coffee (e.g. say 17.0g), level it out, tamp, etc. Using this approach, the volume changes depending on the grind but the amount of coffee is constant. I'd like to know which approach you use and why. Perhaps you have a different approach altogether! I'd like to hear about that too... thanks!!
I've tried several different methods; weigh first, weigh after, dose into basket only, dose into p/f, ect. Now I weigh the beans allowing for some loss, grind for each shot, dose directly into the p/f, stir, tamp, pull shot.
Why? Because it works for me & simplifies the process. For a 16g dose I'll throw in 16.5g & call the resulting dose close enough. I drove myself crazy for the first 6-8 weeks after buying my 1st machine & it took all the fun out of it. Now I relax & do what works for me. Every shot may not be a God Shot but they are all definitely drinkable & thats fine with me.
Why? Because it works for me & simplifies the process. For a 16g dose I'll throw in 16.5g & call the resulting dose close enough. I drove myself crazy for the first 6-8 weeks after buying my 1st machine & it took all the fun out of it. Now I relax & do what works for me. Every shot may not be a God Shot but they are all definitely drinkable & thats fine with me.
Thanks for all your replies. So it seems most people weigh their beans...
Has anyone experimented with differing grams of coffee on the taste of the final shot (keeping extraction time constant by changing the grind)?
Steve, what do you mean by the Spaz is sensitive to overdosing? (I did get it by the way
)[/quote]
Has anyone experimented with differing grams of coffee on the taste of the final shot (keeping extraction time constant by changing the grind)?
Steve, what do you mean by the Spaz is sensitive to overdosing? (I did get it by the way

[/quote]boldstep wrote:Steve, what do you mean by the Spaz is sensitive to overdosing? (I did get it by the way)
Niko was the one who educated me on this. When I first got my Spaz, I attempted to overfill the basket and manually remove the excess.
Check out this witty reparte in this thread:
wforum/viewtopic.php?t=533&start=25
Steve
It's more prone to channeling when there isn't enough head space and the machine simply works better with a longer dwell since it doesn't have a true pre-infusion. Remember, these are European machines designed to be dosed with 14 grams for a double - not the monstrous American standards like most things
This all depends on the bean of course and if you look around, there are people who prefer to under-dose the machine. I myself stay somewhere in the middle, 15 grams is the most I cram in it these days which includes the little bit that gets lost (just like John mentioned). I only weight the beans before the grinder and the consistency is good enough for me as well

This all depends on the bean of course and if you look around, there are people who prefer to under-dose the machine. I myself stay somewhere in the middle, 15 grams is the most I cram in it these days which includes the little bit that gets lost (just like John mentioned). I only weight the beans before the grinder and the consistency is good enough for me as well
[quote="Niko"]It's more prone to channeling when there isn't enough head space and the machine simply works better with a longer dwell since it doesn't have a true pre-infusion. Remember, these are European machines designed to be dosed with 14 grams for a double - not the monstrous American standards like most things
T/quote]
By "dwell" are you referring to the time it takes the water to initially get through the ground coffee? Exactly how does the machine "work better"? i.e. what problems have you experienced with larger does?

T/quote]
By "dwell" are you referring to the time it takes the water to initially get through the ground coffee? Exactly how does the machine "work better"? i.e. what problems have you experienced with larger does?
Yeah, that's what dwell is.
In my experience, overdosing does "tend" to channel more easily than under-dosing PF. I have no problem either way, I can cram more or slightly less and get pretty much the same results depending on the bean. It sounds like you're on the same boat. I've talked with several people who seemed to agree with under-dosing the machine is better, I've tried it and agreed with them and then again I've crammed it like you and pulled longer shots :P
Wow, I should be in politics!
BUT.
...now hear this, these damn baskets are so different that some fit 16 grams to the top and some even more!
I own a particular double basket that falls in the freak department.
So depending which style of basket you own, we can be talking about apples when we really mean oranges :?
In my experience, overdosing does "tend" to channel more easily than under-dosing PF. I have no problem either way, I can cram more or slightly less and get pretty much the same results depending on the bean. It sounds like you're on the same boat. I've talked with several people who seemed to agree with under-dosing the machine is better, I've tried it and agreed with them and then again I've crammed it like you and pulled longer shots :P
Wow, I should be in politics!

BUT.
...now hear this, these damn baskets are so different that some fit 16 grams to the top and some even more!
I own a particular double basket that falls in the freak department.
So depending which style of basket you own, we can be talking about apples when we really mean oranges :?
So would a larger dose increase dwell time? I would think that tamp pressure & grind would dictate the dwell time more then the size of the dose. I'll play with some smaller doses (14g) tomorrow but I really like the flavors I get in my Americanos with a 16g dose. My 18g doses are strictly for Ristrettos & they do taste very, very good.
Wow - sounds like I'm the only one who just does it my feel!
I just fill the portafilter from the Mazzer to heaping, then I level N-S-E-W and tamp. Granted, I know I'm not "perfectly repeatable," but my shots never channel and they're damned good! :D
That's enough for me!
I use a triple basket with a naked pf most of the time. I also tend to overfill the basket, but that's just me...
I just fill the portafilter from the Mazzer to heaping, then I level N-S-E-W and tamp. Granted, I know I'm not "perfectly repeatable," but my shots never channel and they're damned good! :D
That's enough for me!
I use a triple basket with a naked pf most of the time. I also tend to overfill the basket, but that's just me...

Now you've got me thinking. I've been trying to pull shots as good as my local Mpls coffee shop to no avail. I've been using exactly 15 gr per double forever. I just tried bumping it up to 16.5 gr and I like it a lot better. I'm using Paradise Roasters Classico Espresso. Anyone else?
Howard, thanks for calling me a gent! I feel so, well, sophisticated!
Howard, thanks for calling me a gent! I feel so, well, sophisticated!
Try 18g with a nice long, thick, drippy Ristretto pull & see what you think of the flavor. When I ask Espresso roasters like Intelligentsia & Pt's coffee how they pull their shots to get the flavors they describe on their websites they say they are using 18-21g doses.zoey wrote:16g for a 2oz pull. For my machine and my taste, anything more or less is not appealing.
John,JohnB wrote: Try 18g with a nice long, thick, drippy Ristretto pull & see what you think of the flavor. When I ask Espresso roasters like Intelligentsia & Pt's coffee how they pull their shots to get the flavors they describe on their websites they say they are using 18-21g doses.
that's the part that I always struggle with. The commerical machines are more amenable to over dosing. There was a thread on either CG or HB (actually there are probably lots) that was hotly debated about under and over dosing. Last night I went up to 17gr on the Spaz. I'm getting closer to the taste that I get from my local coffee shop. I don't take that lightly because my goal from the very beginning was to make espresso that tastes like my local shop. I asked them and they're are typically over dosing at 21 gr. So, I'm going to try 18gr on the Spaz and see what that goes.
thanks,
Steve
Last edited by bluesman13 on Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Strictly in the interest of providing my fellow forum members info on overdosing with the Vivaldi I made an 18g Ristretto this morning & checked the clearance between the coffee & screen. Before pulling the shot I saw a very small indentation from the center bolt head in the puck. After the shot there was a more pronounced indentation from the bolt but little more then I see after pulling a 16+g double.
The 18+g figure is the weight of the beans before grinding but I did clean out as much as possible from the chute & doser when loading the P/F. I was grinding slightly finer then for a 16g shot but tamped normally making sure to pack all of the coffee into the basket. The shot ran approx 35 secs & produced a little over an ounce of Espresso nectar.
The 18+g figure is the weight of the beans before grinding but I did clean out as much as possible from the chute & doser when loading the P/F. I was grinding slightly finer then for a 16g shot but tamped normally making sure to pack all of the coffee into the basket. The shot ran approx 35 secs & produced a little over an ounce of Espresso nectar.
Thanks JohnB for the info! So how did it taste compared to the 16+g double?
Bluesman13: I also became curious about this subject when I observed my favorite coffee shop really overdosing their PF. It got me thinking perhaps that that is the key to their really exceptional espressos. I am going away on vacation for about 1 week but when I get back I will run a taste test with different number of grams for a double holding extraction time and number of ounces constant.... I'll post the results after I am done.
Bluesman13: I also became curious about this subject when I observed my favorite coffee shop really overdosing their PF. It got me thinking perhaps that that is the key to their really exceptional espressos. I am going away on vacation for about 1 week but when I get back I will run a taste test with different number of grams for a double holding extraction time and number of ounces constant.... I'll post the results after I am done.
cool! Last night I made an 18gr double and it tasted really good. I made another one this am, and, I discovered a huge caffeine difference between a 15gr and 18gr dose!boldstep wrote:Thanks JohnB for the info! So how did it taste compared to the 16+g double?
Bluesman13: I also became curious about this subject when I observed my favorite coffee shop really overdosing their PF. It got me thinking perhaps that that is the key to their really exceptional espressos. I am going away on vacation for about 1 week but when I get back I will run a taste test with different number of grams for a double holding extraction time and number of ounces constant.... I'll post the results after I am done.
While these seem at first blush like generally helpful statements, they really can be made only vis-a-vis a specific coffee. Coffee is not all the same density; lighter roasted coffee is far denser than dark-roasted coffees. So for example, 19+ grams of a light, north Italian roast coffee can be stuffed into the Spaziale portafilter. But with a really dark-roasted coffee, 16 or 17 grams may be the limit.JohnB wrote:Try 18g with a nice long, thick, drippy Ristretto pull & see what you think of the flavor. When I ask Espresso roasters like Intelligentsia & Pt's coffee how they pull their shots to get the flavors they describe on their websites they say they are using 18-21g doses.zoey wrote:16g for a 2oz pull. For my machine and my taste, anything more or less is not appealing.
And now to generalize, 18-21g doses are really not possible with a double basket on any machine; it requires a triple basket.
Yes, with the Calabria. It's pushing the envelope and is all the basket will accommodate; the screw head of the shower screens is well into the coffee cake, dry. As I said, it all depends on the coffee and the roast. In the overall spectrum of espresso coffee, the Calabria is not on the darker end of the spectrum, though it is a the darkest end of Terroir's offerings, and hence is denser and occupies less volume than 18g of darker coffees.JohnB wrote:I've done 18g doses with Black Cat, La Bella Vita, Terrior Calabria all in the standard La Spaziale double basket. Have you tried it yourself?
It's all about the coffee. With some coffees you will not be able to put 18g in the portafilter.zoey wrote:I just wonder how the heck you cram 18oz in?
For illustration only, assume that for some lightly roasted coffee 3TBL=18g and it stuffs the portafilter. Now assume a darkly roasted coffee where 4TBL=18g; it will not fit in the portafilter.
I agree. For example - best extraction with the current beans is when I put a hair less then 16g to the basket. The previous liked 15.5g and no more (at max)Richard wrote:It's all about the coffee. With some coffees you will not be able to put 18g in the portafilter.zoey wrote:I just wonder how the heck you cram 18oz in?
I don't think it's the way. I always end by color and what I noticed with the previos beans I had, that when I used a little bit more coffee and ended shot earlier in relation to the extraction blonding point, I had a tasty rich heavy ristretto, better then what I got stopping at the same point with my usual dose for normale. Hopefully you get what I meanboldstep wrote:Has anyone experimented with differing grams of coffee on the taste of the final shot (keeping extraction time constant by changing the grind)?

I pulled a Ristretto shot this morning using 18.3g(beans) of Terrior's Calabria & the center bolt didn't even make a mark in the dry cake. So far everything I've tried fits but the darkest roast I've used would be Black Cat.Richard wrote: It's all about the coffee. With some coffees you will not be able to put 18g in the portafilter.
For illustration only, assume that for some lightly roasted coffee 3TBL=18g and it stuffs the portafilter. Now assume a darkly roasted coffee where 4TBL=18g; it will not fit in the portafilter.
Well, I tried to cram 18g of very dark and oily beans (mix of Columbian and Sumatra) into the PF. I had to tap it twice on the counter to get it to settle enough to be able to level and tamp it.
I could see an imprint of the screen in the puck and an obvious, perfectly shaped bolt head. The espresso was harsh, acidic, predominantly earthy with overtones of charcoal. No es bueno.
With my beans, at my grind, my machine seems to love 16.5g. It produces a lovely 2oz shot in 27sec.
I could see an imprint of the screen in the puck and an obvious, perfectly shaped bolt head. The espresso was harsh, acidic, predominantly earthy with overtones of charcoal. No es bueno.
With my beans, at my grind, my machine seems to love 16.5g. It produces a lovely 2oz shot in 27sec.
How long was the pour? Did you grind finer or coarser then you would for 16g? I can't drink a 16g decaf espresso straight so I imagine that 18g would be even more unpleasant. I only do the 18g Ristretto once or twice a week & there definitely is a big caffeine hit. Still I like the richer flavors you taste in a thick, slow 1 oz shot.
Hey, I've been enjoying the Calabria since we last exchanged observations about it. Guess I finally learned more about how to handle it. The recent package I received seems roasted just a bit longer than before; there are hints of surface oiling on some of the beans, unlike the earlier batches I had.JohnB wrote:I pulled a Ristretto shot this morning using 18.3g(beans) of Terrior's Calabria . . .
- chas
- Vivaldi Dreamer
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 11:52 pm
- Location: Central Maryland
- Contact:
I recently got the Professional Barista's Handbook based on a recommendation on this forum. It discusses exactly what you tried relative to dozing variations. The recommendation was that, for a fair comparison, you needed to eliminate other variables. The main variable here is that the increased mass of room temperature coffee in the PF drops the temperature gradient across the puck more when you up doze. The theory is that consistency depends on having the same coffee temperature when it exits the bottom of the PF. This requires that you increase the water temp when up dozing.zoey wrote:Well, I tried to cram 18g of very dark and oily beans (mix of Columbian and Sumatra) into the PF. I had to tap it twice on the counter to get it to settle enough to be able to level and tamp it.
I could see an imprint of the screen in the puck and an obvious, perfectly shaped bolt head. The espresso was harsh, acidic, predominantly earthy with overtones of charcoal. No es bueno.
With my beans, at my grind, my machine seems to love 16.5g. It produces a lovely 2oz shot in 27sec.
Chas
LM GS/3 & LaSpaziale Dream v 1.25 (US 120V)
Mazzer Kony E, Customized Rocky
Hottop P/B
LM GS/3 & LaSpaziale Dream v 1.25 (US 120V)
Mazzer Kony E, Customized Rocky
Hottop P/B
Interesting notion, chas, and almost obvious once you hear it stated. Before that, well, we were waiting for an insight. I'll have to try raising temperature when making higher doses and triples.increase the water temp when up dozing
Really, great stuff to think on.
And we fortunate Vivaldi owners can handle that temperature change with aplomb.