
In searching on the Internet it looks like this is going to be formally introduced at SCAA the first week in May.
Yeah, people are gonna be surprised at what is really happening at the cake. First off, nearly all gauges supplied for this purpose are pieces of feces. Second, the pressure drop across small diameter gicleurs is not small. Third, pressure drop across the system is quite machine specific and is another variable that obfuscates discussion of taste between different makes of machinery.
My hope is that through better measurements we can cut through a lot of bs. Also we should start talking about quality control programs now that the measurements will be so easy to perform.
-Greg
I'm trying to wheedle a Version 1 Scace device out of Espresso Parts. Good luck, I'm thinking, on seeing Scace II anytime soon.Niko wrote:Hmm.
Hit 2 birds with 1 stone...I can sure use the Scace 2 for my old S1 since it doesn't even have a gauge for the group.
And not only that, I can check how true the gauge is reading on the VII.
Ahh, more toys to play with.
The only problem is how long is it going to take Greg to make the Spaz version of this?
UPDATE:
It's now available.
For $350!!
Like I said earlier...I hope Greg makes a LaSpaz version sooner than later.
I was told in a phone conversation with someone (name forgotten) at Espresso Parts last week or week before that the original device for the Spaziale is unavailable, and they were not encouraging about it becoming available. I dropped Greg Scace an e-mail inquiring about where/how to get one but have had no response.Niko wrote:Looks like it took a price hike again, they're showing it for $427!
...and yeah, good luck seeing any version for a Spaz soon.
They're only available for La Marzocco so far.
I expect to get one of the new version 2 but not until next year, after that I might look into selling my original Scace Device, there should be a nice fist-fight over it on eBay.
Yes to all the above. Part of that's just being curious or, as they say, conservative retentive about temperature stability, recovery, etc., and part of it's diagnostic in that my taste suggests the offset may need to be changed by at least a degree.Niko wrote:Do you need to run some tests to check the offset on your VII? . . . to make sure group elements are firing on all cylinders and to see if there's any erratic behavior.
OK! It's going in the gun safe as we speak....EricC wrote:So, if you already have the Original Scace Device for the LaSpaz, i would keep it under lock and key.![]()
![]()
![]()
Regards
Eric